Date: 2003-12-04 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wayman.livejournal.com
All ordinations performed by the luckless Formosus were annulled.

That seems to have been the fatal flaw, given that Stephen's own ordination was performed by Formosus! Unless I'm misunderstanding something.

Date: 2003-12-04 01:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tirerim.livejournal.com
No, that was actually intentional, so he couldn't be accused of abandoning the See of Anagni for the See of Rome. (Apparently, bishops are supposed to stick to their posts, or something like that.)

Date: 2003-12-04 01:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wayman.livejournal.com
But being a bishop is a major eligibility condition for becoming pope, right? So if he declares he was never made a bishop (of Anagni), doesn't that equate to denouncing himself as a false pope?

Date: 2003-12-04 01:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tirerim.livejournal.com
I think one just has to be a priest. But see this site for more details on Stephen. I'm not really too sure about how it all works (or, for that matter, how it worked in the ninth century) but other sites seem to confirm this view.

Profile

rushthatspeaks: (Default)
rushthatspeaks

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415 161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 13th, 2026 07:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios