rushthatspeaks: (Default)
[personal profile] rushthatspeaks
I have been nervous about the Freddy books for about a decade now; that is how long it's been since I'd read any of them. At least. I grew up with them, as some relative or other tucked a couple into a holiday box one year, and the library had a circulating selection. I remember really liking the ones with the Martians and the others are kind of blurry, so I had the fear one always has about childhood books: did this, while I grew up, receive a visit from the Suck Fairy? And did she bring her friends the Racism and Sexism Fairies along for the ride? I was so nervous about the Freddy books that I put off rereading the ones I own for about five years due, solely, to that nervousness. They are exactly the kind of thing that turns out to be awful when you grow up a depressing percentage of the time, and given that they were written in the 1930s through 1950s, well, the awful could have been spectacularly hideous.

I went through the library today and reread a lot of the ones I knew as a kid and read one, Freddy Goes to the North Pole, for the first time.

Thankfully, they aren't terrible. Whew. They are not brilliant, and they vary in quality extremely; you can see Brooks teaching himself to write them as he goes. They do not have consistent worldbuilding to the point where they do not have worldbuilding at all. They do not have consistent memories of things that happened in previous books, even.

But they are and remain charming, cute little books about a farm full of talking animals who, as a farm full of talking animals would inevitably be, are bored with farm work and therefore do anything else that comes into their heads. Freddy, the protagonist pig, has been a detective, an editor, a politician, a travel agent, a rocket scientist, a terrible poet (sadly a consistent feature)... the list goes ever on and on. The whole is set in a sort of bucolic-to-the-point-of-comedic-exaggeration whitebread extremely-stereotype-American small town which manages to get away with its strains of anti-Communism, rabid patriotism and general dislike of politicians by being such a caricature that you cannot possibly take any of its politics seriously. I am not capable of taking anti-Communist sentiments as intended as a real statement when they are expressed by a sheriff who hands off the key to the jail to his prisoners every weekend to make sure they don't feel unloved and rejected by society. I'm just not. Nobody can make me.

As an adult, I am capable of noticing which precise great English poems Freddy has plagiarized and turned into travesties of themselves in the service of his, uh, art. (Put down the Kipling! And back away slowly!) Apart from that, the books really haven't changed a bit, although I have no idea what anyone would think of them now who didn't read them as a kid.

The new-to-me-today is an odd duck among them, one of the ones that is more out-and-out fantastical, which is not the usual direction of this series. I don't think it works very well, but this is only the second and Brooks is still finding his feet. The animals decide to found a travel agency for other animals, in which they show them around various sights of interest in exchange for farm labor, and consequently all find themselves free to take a very long vacation; a party decides to go the North Pole. When it is not heard back from, another party goes... and discovers, in fact, Santa Claus. Whose shop has been taken over by the crew of a whaling ship who want to make it more efficient, which is making everybody miserable. The animals have to find a way to get the crew to go home without hurting them, since they generally mean well. Along the way they save a couple of orphans, have a genuinely tense confrontation with a wolf pack, and totally disregard everything about the way the climate on the way to the North Pole actually is (seriously, they all sleep on the ground under feather beds every night and it's just fine). It's an incredibly peculiar book.

As with all other Brooks, some animals talk and some don't, and some animals who talk eat other animals who talk, even knowing they talk, and some people are willing to eat even animals they know talk while other people are perfectly willing to treat the animals exactly as they would human beings, and the inconsistency of all of this multiplies by about ten thousand when you throw in Santa Claus, a crew of whalers, abused children, a fake treasure map, and lots and lots of filked Tennyson and Walter Scott. This specific novel doesn't quite gel, in that it's more a series of peculiar set-pieces than a coherent anything, but I can't disrecommend it, because it's certainly different.

And as I said, the series in general holds up, especially the ones with the Martians, because Brooks turns out to be way better at SF than fantasy, once you just take the talking animals as one of those things that happens sometimes. Which in fact is how everyone takes it. So, while these are not the sort of kids' books that turn out to be treasures that were totally beyond one's comprehension at the time (Keith Robertson's Henry Reed books turn out to be hilarious in ways I had never dreamed possible), they are the sort you can read happily and reminiscently without feeling sick to one's stomach. This makes me very cheerful, because, well, that's a whole chunk of childhood.

Date: 2011-08-24 06:33 pm (UTC)
movingfinger: (Default)
From: [personal profile] movingfinger
1. The talking animal problem gets, strangely, more interesting to me as I get older. This book/series where talking animals eat other talking animals is, in all seriousness, an outlier, I think.

2. Henry Reed FTW! And Midge! And the trailer full of fireworks!

Date: 2011-08-24 06:08 am (UTC)
sovay: (Lord Peter Wimsey: passion)
From: [personal profile] sovay
the series in general holds up, especially the ones with the Martians


The Martians were my favorite.

Date: 2011-08-24 07:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
...filked Tennyson and Walter Scott

Quote? Please?


Date: 2011-08-24 09:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
You mean what he thought 'e might require, 'e went an' took?

Date: 2011-08-24 12:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I read FREDDY THE COWBOY about a million times.

I don't think our library had a lot of them. Maybe 3 or 4.

Date: 2011-08-24 02:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I grew up on the Freddy books and am happy to hear that they still don't suck. Sometime along the way, Animal Farm infiltrated my memories of them, so I kind of expect serious weirdness.

Date: 2011-08-24 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
To each their own, I know... but the Freddy books were, basically, my fandom as a kid, and I'm relieved that you like 'em too. No one else ever seems to have read them, so I feel they don't get enough love. "Freddy Goes to the North Pole" is early enough that he hasn't really found his voice to the extent he would later. Walter Brooks had a bizarrely long writing career--he's kind of like Herge with the Tintin series, in that respect.

Brooks has a nice, long, fertile middle period, after he found his voice but before he could become formulaic. The best single book, to my mind, is "Freddy Goes Camping". Wilderness exploration, Wodehouse-quality aunts, amateur detection, and ghostbusting! Four great tastes that taste great together. I couldn't get enough of this one as a kid.

Oh, and I owe my earliest understanding of the way the electoral system works to "Wiggins for President", aka "Freddy the Politician." I should just post about this myself.

As an adult, I am capable of noticing which precise great English poems Freddy has plagiarized and turned into travesties of themselves in the service of his, uh, art. (Put down the Kipling! And back away slowly!)

I think you're being unduly harsh here. Freddy's one of my favorite filkers--and something of an inspiration to me when I try to write funny poetry. As for his failed efforts, they have something of an "Unstrung Harp" effect on me: Freddy's flailing just as I do when searching for a perfect word or non-idiot rhyme.

"Hour after hour, day after day,
Before even they speak I know just what they'll say.

Day after day, week after week,
I know what they'll say before even they speak.

Week after week, month after month--"

Date: 2011-08-28 02:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile]
I never read Freddy, but I'm glad to hear that the Henry Reed books hold up, as I liked them a lot as a child.


rushthatspeaks: (Default)

October 2017

8910111213 14
15161718 192021

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 23rd, 2017 03:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios