As you may recall, I loved Appelt's Keeper enough to be totally inarticulate about it. The Underneath is her earlier children's/YA novel (she appears to have also written many picture books and a memoir), and it's also very, very good, although I was not quite as blown away.
Mind you, I'm glad that I read this one second even though I like it marginally less, because the cover and flap and so on make this look like exactly the kind of book I do not pick up and did not pick up as a kid. In fact, it looks like the kind of book I usually run away from screaming, because it's a book partly about animals in a bad situation involving a neglectful and abusive human, and most books of that sort place very highly in the Most Depressing Book Ever Written contest.
This one is not a light book. It probably would have traumatized me as a child. There is a lot of betrayal going around in it, there is death, there are things that just do not work out. But as an adult, I'm very impressed by it, because it doesn't depress me now as it would have then-- it has moments of light in all the right places, and it's well-crafted in a way that I find inherently joyful.
One thread of the story centers around the old bloodhound, Ranger, who has spent years chained to the porch of his hateful master, and the calico cat and her kittens who befriend him and make him into family. One thread is that master's hunt for the biggest of all alligators, somewhere in the East Texas bayou they all live in. And one is about a thing who has many names, but primarily Grandmother Mocassin, who is snake and more than snake, still resonating from a set of betrayals more than a thousand years old.
Appelt is good at her animals, who have slightly more intelligence than real animals, but do not have the problem-solving skills and reasoning capacity of humans. It feels realistic when they can't come up with solutions for things most people would figure out, but it also feels realistic when the bloodhound sings the blues: that's a fine line right there, and she walks it.
The other thing this does that impressed me is that there's a level of myth, and a level of action on a personal and domestic level, and the book manages to have all the characters, magical or natural, work on both levels. You can see the lines of the overarching story and the way it will crystallize into legend just as well with the dog and cats as with Grandmother Moccasin; you can see the level of practicality just as well with her as with the dog and cats.
The only reason I didn't like this quite as well is that it is less impossibly delicate and evanescent than Keeper, which is reasonable considering the subject matter, and also the subject matter is less interesting to me personally. Which is to say, it's probably me, and this is a very good book.
You can comment here or at the Dreamwidth crosspost. There are
comments over there.
Mind you, I'm glad that I read this one second even though I like it marginally less, because the cover and flap and so on make this look like exactly the kind of book I do not pick up and did not pick up as a kid. In fact, it looks like the kind of book I usually run away from screaming, because it's a book partly about animals in a bad situation involving a neglectful and abusive human, and most books of that sort place very highly in the Most Depressing Book Ever Written contest.
This one is not a light book. It probably would have traumatized me as a child. There is a lot of betrayal going around in it, there is death, there are things that just do not work out. But as an adult, I'm very impressed by it, because it doesn't depress me now as it would have then-- it has moments of light in all the right places, and it's well-crafted in a way that I find inherently joyful.
One thread of the story centers around the old bloodhound, Ranger, who has spent years chained to the porch of his hateful master, and the calico cat and her kittens who befriend him and make him into family. One thread is that master's hunt for the biggest of all alligators, somewhere in the East Texas bayou they all live in. And one is about a thing who has many names, but primarily Grandmother Mocassin, who is snake and more than snake, still resonating from a set of betrayals more than a thousand years old.
Appelt is good at her animals, who have slightly more intelligence than real animals, but do not have the problem-solving skills and reasoning capacity of humans. It feels realistic when they can't come up with solutions for things most people would figure out, but it also feels realistic when the bloodhound sings the blues: that's a fine line right there, and she walks it.
The other thing this does that impressed me is that there's a level of myth, and a level of action on a personal and domestic level, and the book manages to have all the characters, magical or natural, work on both levels. You can see the lines of the overarching story and the way it will crystallize into legend just as well with the dog and cats as with Grandmother Moccasin; you can see the level of practicality just as well with her as with the dog and cats.
The only reason I didn't like this quite as well is that it is less impossibly delicate and evanescent than Keeper, which is reasonable considering the subject matter, and also the subject matter is less interesting to me personally. Which is to say, it's probably me, and this is a very good book.
You can comment here or at the Dreamwidth crosspost. There are