The what with the which in the where now?
Apr. 13th, 2006 12:09 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
However, although the book is of fairly recent vintage (mid-1960s, I believe), the author follows the old-fashioned practice of putting any material which might be considered explicit into Latin, because as we all know every adult over the age of twenty-one is fluent in Latin and no one under the age of consent has ever studied it.
This includes Latinization of a sex manual of the Sui Dynasty, in which all of the names of various techniques have been rendered in English and all the descriptions haven't. And I, selflessly, in the interest of scholarly good, literary clarity, annoyance at prudery
Which requires the input of the Internet.
[Poll #709342]
All translations will appear in an unlocked entry which I'll link to my userinfo and add to as time goes on.
Ah, Scholarship.
ETA: The first set of translations are up.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 04:35 am (UTC)Yes, it is absolutely purely intellectual curiosity that makes me wish to read the translations. *koff*
no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 04:38 am (UTC)Clearly there should be a Saiyuki ficathon in which everyone takes one position and writes something.
In the interest of scholarship, of course.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 04:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 04:43 am (UTC)* No, really. I somehow got my hands on a historical bodice-ripper when I was 11 or 12 that was all about this English woman who'd gotten captured and sold to a Chinese merchant as a sex slave. She eventually somehow hooked up with an English lord who had no problems at all with her concubine historyand had lots of sex with him, but not before spending a few years playing her Chinese master's Jade Flute on a regular basis.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 05:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 05:21 am (UTC)That also seems to be Book 4 in a series.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 06:26 am (UTC)<raises hand> (Though even for me it's taking some effort with many of these.)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 06:27 am (UTC)Hold it, wait - "Two Dancing Female Phoenix Birds?" Did the Chinese invent lesbians, too?! Duuuude, they totally *were* the most advanced civilization! [/Keanu Reeves]
no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 10:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 02:19 pm (UTC)bless you. ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 09:41 pm (UTC)(a) That would be fascinating.
(b) Does Victorian porn also contain hilarious position titles?
(c) If you haven't seen this already, I feel it is my scholarly duty to point it out to you. Whose life could be complete without at least a passing familiarity with Victorian tentacle porn?
no subject
Date: 2006-04-15 04:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-17 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 09:14 pm (UTC)Yep. That was my reaction, too. Barry Hughart rocks even more than he already does.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-15 01:19 am (UTC)