Date: 2016-09-05 05:28 pm (UTC)
Your advice is also true of literary criticism. I've reviewed scholarly articles for journals for many years, and not once has my review included "And this really needed to be longer!" Instead, my advice echoes yours, except, to be honest, I've also believed--of a 36-page-long article--this needed to be 36 pages shorter.
From:
Anonymous
OpenID
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

rushthatspeaks: (Default)
rushthatspeaks

October 2017

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910111213 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 18th, 2017 03:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios