Date: 2016-09-05 05:28 pm (UTC)
Your advice is also true of literary criticism. I've reviewed scholarly articles for journals for many years, and not once has my review included "And this really needed to be longer!" Instead, my advice echoes yours, except, to be honest, I've also believed--of a 36-page-long article--this needed to be 36 pages shorter.
From:
Anonymous
OpenID
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

rushthatspeaks: (Default)
rushthatspeaks

August 2017

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 21st, 2017 05:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios