Date: 2016-09-05 05:28 pm (UTC)
Your advice is also true of literary criticism. I've reviewed scholarly articles for journals for many years, and not once has my review included "And this really needed to be longer!" Instead, my advice echoes yours, except, to be honest, I've also believed--of a 36-page-long article--this needed to be 36 pages shorter.
From:
Anonymous
OpenID
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

rushthatspeaks: (Default)
rushthatspeaks

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910 1112 131415
1617 18 192021 22
2324252627 2829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 30th, 2017 12:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios